As part of the Canadian Centre for Health Economics (CCHE) Friday Health Economics Series, we welcome Professor Logan McLeod this Friday October 17th, 10am – 12pm in HS100 (Health Sciences Building 155 College Street). Professor McLeod will explore “Changing the Schedule of Medical Benefits and the Effect on Primary Care Physician Billing: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Alberta”.
Dr. Logan McLeod is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Economics at Wilfrid Laurier University in Waterloo. He is also a Faculty Associate of the Canadian Centre for Health Economics. He holds a Ph.D. in Economics from McMaster University. His primary research areas are applied microeconometrics and applied microeconomic theory in the field of Health Economics. His research focuses on the economics of primary health care and covers three specific topics: utilization of health care services, the determinants of healthy behaviours, and health care financing (i.e. financial barriers to access). Dr. McLeod’s research has been published in leading academic journals including the Journal of Health Economics, Health Economics, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, and the Canadian Journal of Economics.
We exploit a quasi-experiment in the province of Alberta, Canada, to identify how changes in the schedule of medical benefits affected the provision of primary care services to patients with multiple co-morbidities. Specifically, Alberta introduced a new fee code to compensate physicians for completing a comprehensive annual care plan (CACP) for qualifying patients. During the period of study, primary care physicians could practice in two settings: (i) solo practice; or (ii) primary care networks (i.e., team based care). This paper asks how the policy change affected physician-billing patterns and whether delivery structure affected physician-billing.
Data come from Alberta’s administrative physician claims data, covering the full population of Alberta and all services provided by primary care physicians, for one year before and two years after the policy change. We employ a difference-in-differences methodology and implement a set of robustness checks to control for confounding from other contemporaneous changes that may have occurred in Alberta as well as unobserved physician heterogeneity.
Our results suggest the new fee code became the sixth most billed code in its first year (totalling $17.9 million), but was billed by only a small proportion of physicians (roughly 2% of physicians accounted for 20% of total billings). The fee code was disproportionately billed by physicians in team-based care (PCNs), and increased the billing of other complementary fee codes by 5%-10% (or roughly $80 million). The results suggest the unintended consequences of a well-intentioned policy can be costly.
Link to paper: http://www.lcerpa.org/public/papers/LCERPA_2014_11.pdf
To be added to the CCHE Health Economics seminar series mailing list please send an e-mail to: email@example.com