IHPME Health Policy Rounds: Dr. Lauren Lapointe-Shaw

Share Event

Effectiveness of a financial incentive to physicians for timely follow-up after hospital discharge: a population-based time series analysisProfile Lauren Lapointe Shaw

Lauren Lapointe-Shaw, MDCM FRCPC is a PhD student in Clinical Epidemiology and Healthcare Research at IHPME, a fellow at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and a Philipson Scholar of the Department of Medicine. Her thesis centers on discharge from hospital, follow-up care and hospital readmissions. After obtaining undergraduate (Biology) and medical degrees from McGill University, she completed her Internal Medicine residency at the University of Toronto. She currently practices as a General Internist at Toronto General Hospital. She is broadly interested in health policy and measuring the quality of our healthcare system, and is a founding member of the General Medicine Inpatient Initiative (GEMINI- https://www.geminimedicine.org/).


Background: Timely follow-up after hospital discharge may decrease readmission to hospital. Financial incentives to improve follow-up have been introduced in the United States and Canada, but it is unknown whether they are effective. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of an incentive program on timely physician follow-up after hospital discharge.
Methods: We conducted an interventional time series analysis of all medical and surgical patients who were discharged home from hospital between Apr. 1, 2002, and Jan. 30, 2015, in Ontario, Canada. The intervention was a supplemental billing code for physician follow-up within 14 days of discharge from hospital, introduced in 2006. The primary outcome was an outpatient visit within 14 days of discharge. Secondary outcomes were 7-day follow-up and a composite of emergency department visits, non-elective hospital readmission and death within 14 days.
Results: We included 8 008 934 patient discharge records. The incentive code was claimed in 31% of eligible visits by 51% of eligible physicians, and cost $17.5 million over the study period. There was no change in the average monthly rate of outcomes in the year before the incentive was introduced compared with the year following introduction: 14-day follow-up (66.5% v. 67.0%, overall p = 0.5), 7-day follow-up (44.9% v. 44.9%, overall p = 0.5) and composite outcome (16.7% v. 16.9%, overall p = 0.2).
Interpretation: Despite uptake by physicians, a financial incentive did not alter follow-up after hospital discharge. This lack of effect may be explained by features of the incentive or by extra-physician barriers to follow-up. These barriers should be considered by policymakers before introducing similar initiatives

Related Events

Surfacing the Need and Concepts for Alternative Design in Long Term Care


Dec 20, 2023 from 4pm-5:30pm (EST)


IHPME Events

Event Details
Digital fingerprint

Future of Health Leadership, Informatics and Policy (FHLIP) Conference


Feb 22, 2024

University of Toronto – Hart House, Great Hall
Join us at the University of Toronto’s historic Hart House for an insightful exploration of digital health policy and leadership.

IHPME Events

Event Details

Sign up for IHPME Connect.

Keep up to date with IHPME’s News & Research, Events & Program, Recognition, e-newsletter.

* indicates required

Get in Contact


Email Address: ihpme.communications@​utoronto.ca

Manages all IHPME-wide communications and marketing initiatives, including events and announcements.